TPF : Paradoxes & Fuzzy Logic
Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 11:55 am
The Full Import of Paradoxes
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussi ... ent/699216
1. Classical logic has to use Occam's broom (sweep paradoxes under the rug) otherwise, via ex falso quodlibet, concede that classical logic is trivial.
2. We're using some version of paraconsistent logic and we're not aware of it. — Agent Smith
Classical binary Logic is best used for problems that can be precisely defined with integer numerical values. But human contradictions are seldom concisely defined; instead loosely sketched with inexplicit subjective truth-values.
A formalized version of "paraconsistent logic" (logic of paradox) is the Fuzzy Logic that is used in computer science for complex puzzles that are hard to define numerically, such as human beliefs & intuitions. It is especially useful in Artificial Intelligence and Evolutionary Programming.
We're not aware of our sloppy logic because it is intuitive, so we don't normally examine it with classical rules in mind. That's why divisive emotional issues, such as Abortion & Racism tend to polarize people. And can only be resolved, to some degree, with critical (rational) thinking : to discover the inconsistencies in our beliefs.
Paraconsistent Logic :
A paraconsistent logic is an attempt at a logical system to deal with contradictions in a discriminating way. Alternatively, paraconsistent logic is the subfield of logic that is concerned with studying and developing "inconsistency-tolerant" systems of logic which reject the principle of explosion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraconsistent_logic
Most if not all thinkers are under the impression that they're using classical logic - they don't take too kindly to contradictions. — Agent Smith
Actually, most thinkers have an ego-boosting impression of their own reasoning abilities. We find it easier to see the contradictions in other people's ideas than in our own thoughts. Intuition always seems true, even when it aint.
A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.
— William James.
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussi ... ent/699216
1. Classical logic has to use Occam's broom (sweep paradoxes under the rug) otherwise, via ex falso quodlibet, concede that classical logic is trivial.
2. We're using some version of paraconsistent logic and we're not aware of it. — Agent Smith
Classical binary Logic is best used for problems that can be precisely defined with integer numerical values. But human contradictions are seldom concisely defined; instead loosely sketched with inexplicit subjective truth-values.
A formalized version of "paraconsistent logic" (logic of paradox) is the Fuzzy Logic that is used in computer science for complex puzzles that are hard to define numerically, such as human beliefs & intuitions. It is especially useful in Artificial Intelligence and Evolutionary Programming.
We're not aware of our sloppy logic because it is intuitive, so we don't normally examine it with classical rules in mind. That's why divisive emotional issues, such as Abortion & Racism tend to polarize people. And can only be resolved, to some degree, with critical (rational) thinking : to discover the inconsistencies in our beliefs.
Paraconsistent Logic :
A paraconsistent logic is an attempt at a logical system to deal with contradictions in a discriminating way. Alternatively, paraconsistent logic is the subfield of logic that is concerned with studying and developing "inconsistency-tolerant" systems of logic which reject the principle of explosion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraconsistent_logic
Most if not all thinkers are under the impression that they're using classical logic - they don't take too kindly to contradictions. — Agent Smith
Actually, most thinkers have an ego-boosting impression of their own reasoning abilities. We find it easier to see the contradictions in other people's ideas than in our own thoughts. Intuition always seems true, even when it aint.
A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.
— William James.